Pre-register
Freeze the core questions, markets, surfaces, entities, truth sources, treatments and exclusions before the baseline.
Version 1.0 · 30 August 2026
Humenta's AEO measurement protocol separates broad directional monitoring from a smaller frozen core designed to make the first 90 days interpretable. Every observation records its denominator, timestamp, surface, collection method, repetitions, sources, missingness and confidence so a readiness score or sampled answer is never misrepresented as universal visibility or causation.
A Humenta AEO result is an observation with a denominator, timestamp, surface, collection method, source set and preserved evidence. It states successful and failed samples, repetitions, location or account context where known, material unknowns and confidence. It is not a claim about every user, every location, every provider experience or every future answer.
Freeze the core questions, markets, surfaces, entities, truth sources, treatments and exclusions before the baseline.
Run multiple observations because model output is stochastic. Preserve differences rather than choosing the best answer.
Keep API output, consumer-interface observation, Google Search Console data and analytics in separate evidence classes.
Report missingness, access changes, provider changes, reviewer decisions, uncertainty and method revisions.
Define the commercial question, organization and product entities, target audience, markets, languages, comparison set, approved surfaces and data boundaries.
Approve at least ten material claims and their primary sources. Record names, descriptions, offers, proof, exclusions, risky ambiguities and facts the answer must not invent.
Select buyer-relevant informational, evaluative and recommendation questions. Randomly assign eight treatment questions and four holdout questions before execution begins.
Run three repetitions per core question and approved surface under documented account, locale and collection conditions. Store full answers, citations, timestamps, errors and cost.
Monitor the plan's 150 to 1,000 prompts for directional visibility, competitor, source and content signals. Do not treat every movement in this changing panel as a causal result.
Apply technical, entity, content and legitimate authority changes only to the treatment set's mapped source system. Record owner, approval, publication evidence and effective date.
Repeat the frozen core under matched conditions at endline. Compare treatment and holdout movement, repetitions, answer quality, cited sources and missingness.
Separate observed facts, verified facts, inferences and vendor statements. Report delivery, directional signals, controlled-core findings, limitations and the next decision.
The core is intentionally small enough to inspect answer-by-answer and stable enough to repeat. It does not represent all demand. The larger plan panel supplies breadth; the 12-question panel supplies discipline.
| Field | What is recorded | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Question identity | Frozen text, intent, treatment/holdout assignment, market and language | Prevents silent prompt drift and post-hoc selection |
| Surface identity | Provider, product surface, model when exposed, account state and locale | Consumer products and APIs can produce different outputs |
| Collection | Permitted method, timestamp, repetition, session conditions and errors | Makes the observation reproducible enough to audit |
| Answer evidence | Full response, citations or links, source domains and captured artifact | Prevents a score from replacing the underlying answer |
| Evaluation | Brand presence, position, relevance, sentiment, claims, factual status and reviewer | Separates automated extraction from human judgment |
| Missingness | Blocked run, unavailable surface, no answer, no citation, parse failure or exclusion | Keeps the denominator honest |
| Cost | Usage, operator and specialist effort where available | Connects evidence quality to an economically viable program |
Valid observations that mention the in-scope entity divided by all valid eligible observations. Missing runs are reported separately.
Valid observations citing an approved owned or controlled source divided by valid observations that exposed citations.
In-scope entity mentions divided by eligible mentions across the frozen comparison set, with the exact inclusion rule stated.
Material claims consistent with the truth pack divided by all verifiable material claims about the entity. Opinions and unverifiable claims are separate.
A disclosed account-level rubric across technical access, entity consistency, evidence quality, answer coverage and external corroboration. It is not a provider ranking.
Completed and verified work divided by approved in-scope work due in the period, with client/access blockers reported separately.
Traffic, pipeline and revenue may be reported when the client has approved analytics and attribution. Correlation is not labeled causation unless the design supports that conclusion.
“ChatGPT visibility” is incomplete unless the product surface, access mode, locale, session state, date and method are known.
Humenta uses only collection methods approved for the program. A provider API response is never presented as a consumer-interface observation. If access or terms prevent a surface from being collected responsibly, it is marked unavailable rather than silently substituted.
Repetitions reduce cherry-picking but cannot remove randomness or guarantee the next user sees the same answer.
Providers change models, interfaces, retrieval and citations. Method changes are versioned and breaks are disclosed.
Twelve questions support close inspection, not universal market representation. The broad panel remains directional.
Holdouts improve interpretation but cannot isolate every market, competitor, provider or search change in a live environment.
Humenta does not guarantee a ranking, citation, answer, traffic level, lead volume or revenue result. Delivery commitments and remedies belong in the signed order form.
The protocol follows the evidence, not folklore about special AI files or guaranteed markup.
Scope the questions, surfaces and source system before the first intervention.